JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 15, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Rosa Deliz Barrera De Barrera

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente contentivo de la tutela propuesta por la ciudadana de la referencia contra la Subdirección de Prestaciones Económicas y Sociales de la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social -Cajanal-, al Juzgado Segundo de Menores de Bucaramanga para que trámite y decida en forma inmediata, en acatamiento a lo resuelto en la sentencia de 18 de julio de 2002, proferida por el Consejo de Estado, dará aplicación a lo dispuesto en el inciso segundo del numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 del 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por la ciudadana Rosa Deliz Barrera de Barrera contra la Subdireccion de Prestaciones Economicas y Sociales de la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social -Cajanal-, al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. de Menores de Bucaramanga, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.